Trending searches · 2026-10-07

Coco Gauff vs Elise Mertens: Mertens Wins 6-3, 6-3 at China Open, Faces Swiatek

This post was compiled with AI. We checked it against the original articles and announcements, but please confirm details in the linked sources. Trending on Google Trends (GB) 1,000+ · (CA) 100+; sources collected 2026-10-07 18:10 (KST).

In one line

Elise Mertens beat Coco Gauff 6-3, 6-3 in the fourth round of the WTA 1000 China Open in Beijing on Wednesday, Oct. 7, 2026. It was the Belgian's first win over Gauff in six meetings. Mertens plays Iga Swiatek in the quarterfinals.

Why people are searching

Google Trends listed "coco gauff" at 1,000+ searches in the United Kingdom and 100+ in Canada when we checked at 6:10 p.m. Korea time on Oct. 7. The stories attached were about Mertens knocking Gauff out of the China Open. The rise appears to follow the upset, since Gauff was the No. 3 seed and the 2024 Beijing champion.

Key table

ItemDetail
RoundRound of 16
ScoreMertens 6-3, 6-3
SeedsNo. 13 vs No. 3
RankingGauff world No. 4
H2H beforeGauff 5-0
NextQF vs Swiatek

How the match went

Mertens took both sets 6-3 in a match that lasted a little over an hour, and she closed it out with an ace. Gauff made 34 unforced errors, eight of them double faults, and won 61% of the points behind her first serve and 42% behind her second. According to the WTA's match report, the closing ace was Mertens' second of the match, she won 10 of her last 11 service points, and four of Gauff's double faults came in the game that cost her the first set.

Gauff had won all five previous meetings. The WTA report notes that Mertens had come close before, leading 6-0, 3-1 at Eastbourne in 2021 and holding three match points in Dubai eight months ago.

What it means for Mertens

In her on-court interview, Mertens said her coach and boyfriend has a birthday the next day and that she dedicated the win to him.

Swiatek is next

Swiatek beat Iva Jovic 6-1, 6-3 on Wednesday. Swiatek, the 2023 Beijing champion, leads Mertens 2-0 in their head-to-head.

What we could not confirm

Sources